Gārhasthya-Śreṣṭhatā and Kṣatriya-Daṇḍadhāraṇa
Householder Primacy and the Royal Duty of Punishment
एक दिन लिखित शंखके आश्रमपर आये। दैवेच्छासे शंख भी उसी समय आश्रमसे बाहर निकल गये थे ।। सो5भिगम्याश्रमं भ्रातु: शंखस्य लिखितस्तदा । फलानि पातयामास सम्यक्परिणतान्युत
so’bhigamyāśramaṁ bhrātuḥ śaṅkhasya likhitastadā | phalāni pātayāmāsa samyak-pariṇatāny uta ||
Vyāsa dijo: «Entonces Likhita se acercó al āśrama de su hermano Śaṅkha. En ese mismo momento, por el giro del destino, Śaṅkha había salido del eremitorio. Likhita hizo caer (de los árboles) frutos ya plenamente maduros».
व्यास उवाच
The verse sets up the principle that dharma is sensitive to intention, ownership, and permission: even taking or using what belongs to another—here, causing fruits to fall at another’s hermitage—can become ethically significant, especially for those committed to restraint and righteousness.
Likhita arrives at his brother Śaṅkha’s hermitage. By coincidence (daiva), Śaṅkha is away at that moment. Likhita then makes ripe fruits fall from the trees, an action that will lead into the ensuing moral-legal consequences in the Śaṅkha–Likhita episode.