Shloka 47
पुनर्द्यूत-समाह्वानम्
Renewed Summons to the Dice-Game and Exile Wager
भीष्म उवाच न धर्मसौक्ष्म्यात् सुभगे विवेक्तु शवनोमि ते प्रश्नमिम॑ यथावत् । अस्वाम्यशक्त: पणितुं परस्वं स्त्रियाश्व भर्तुर्वशतां समीक्ष्य
bhīṣma uvāca | na dharmasaukṣmyāt subhage vivektuṃ śaknomi te praśnam imaṃ yathāvat | asvāmy-aśaktaḥ paṇituṃ parasvaṃ striyāś ca bhartur vaśatāṃ samīkṣya ||
Bhishma dijo: «Oh señora afortunada, puesto que la verdadera naturaleza del dharma es sumamente sutil, no me es posible analizar tu pregunta con corrección y plenitud. Quien no es el dueño legítimo no tiene autoridad para apostar la propiedad ajena; y, sin embargo, por tradición se considera que la mujer está bajo el dominio de su esposo. Al ponderar estos principios contrapuestos, me veo incapaz de dictar un fallo definitivo».
भीष्म उवाच
Educational Q&A
Dharma can be so subtle that even a wise elder hesitates to issue a clear verdict when principles conflict—here, the rule that only an owner may wager property versus the social-legal assumption of a पत्नी being under her husband’s authority.
Bhishma responds to a woman’s pointed question arising from the dice-game context: whether someone lacking rightful ownership can stake another person/wealth. He acknowledges the general prohibition, but notes the prevailing view of a wife’s dependence on her husband, and therefore refrains from a decisive judgment.