शकुनि: सीबलस्तात हते कर्णे किमब्रवीत् । तात! पहले द्यूतक्रीड़ाका आयोजन करके पाण्डवोंको ठग लेनेके बाद जिसे बड़ा हर्ष हुआ था, वह सुबल-पुत्र शकुनि कर्णके मारे जानेपर क्या बोला?
Vaiśampāyana uvāca — Śakuniḥ Saubalastāta hate Karṇe kim abravīt | Tāṭa! pūrvaṁ dyūtakrīḍākā āyojanaṁ kṛtvā Pāṇḍavān ṭhagitvā yaḥ mahān harṣaṁ lebhe, sa Saubala-putraḥ Śakuniḥ Karṇasya māraṇe kim avadat?
Dijo Vaiśampāyana: «Hijo mío, cuando Karṇa hubo sido muerto, ¿qué dijo Śakuni, el hijo de Subala? Aquel que una vez se regocijó sobremanera tras organizar el juego de dados y despojar con engaños a los Pāṇḍavas, ¿qué palabras pronunció ese Śakuni ante la muerte de Karṇa?»
वैशम्पायन उवाच
The verse frames an ethical contrast: the same agent who once rejoiced after orchestrating deceit (the dice-game) is now questioned about his response to a major wartime death. It highlights how adharma-driven actions and attitudes persist across contexts, and invites reflection on the moral consequences of manipulation and cruelty.
The narrator Vaiśampāyana poses a question about Śakuni’s words after Karṇa’s death. It serves as a transition, preparing the listener for Śakuni’s reaction and commentary in the aftermath of Karṇa being slain in the Kurukṣetra war.