आदीप्तमिव तत् सैन्यं शरैश्छिन्नतनुच्छदम् । आसीत् सुशोणितक्लिन्नं फुल्लाशोकवनं यथा,उस समय सारी सेना जलती हुई-सी दिखायी देती थी। बाणोंसे उसके कवच छित्न- भिन्न हो गये थे तथा वह खूनसे लथपथ हो खिले हुए अशोकवनके समान प्रतीत होती थी
ādīptam iva tat sainyaṃ śaraiś chinna-tanu-cchadam | āsīt suśoṇita-klinnaṃ phullāśoka-vanaṃ yathā ||
Dijo Sañjaya: «Aquel ejército parecía como si estuviera en llamas. Sus coberturas—armaduras y defensas—habían sido desgarradas y hechas jirones por las flechas; empapado en abundante sangre, se asemejaba a un bosque de aśokas en plena floración.»
संजय उवाच
The verse offers no direct injunction but conveys an ethical reflection through imagery: war’s splendor is illusory—what seems ‘ablaze’ is actually a host torn by weapons and soaked in blood. The poetic comparison to a blossoming aśoka grove heightens the contrast between natural beauty and human-made devastation, prompting discernment about the true cost of violence.
Sañjaya reports to Dhṛtarāṣṭra the appearance of the battlefield: the army looks as if it is burning; arrows have shredded its protective coverings (armor), and the troops are drenched in blood, creating a vivid, almost surreal scene likened to a flowering aśoka forest.