Dāyavibhāga (Inheritance Apportionment) and Household Precedence — Dialogue of Yudhiṣṭhira and Bhīṣma
समीक्ष्य च बहून् दोषान् संवासाद् विद्धि पाणयो: । यथा निष्ठाकरं शुल्क न जात्वासीत् तथा शूणु
samīkṣya ca bahūn doṣān saṃvāsād viddhi pāṇayoḥ | yathā niṣṭhākaraṃ śulkaṃ na jātva āsīt tathā śṛṇu ||
Dijo Bhīṣma: «Reflexiona bien sobre las muchas faltas que nacen de tratar el matrimonio como mera convivencia asegurada por un pago. Sabe que una “tasa” no basta por sí sola para dar certeza definitiva al enlace. En tiempos antiguos, tal práctica jamás fue aceptada como norma establecida—escucha mientras lo explico».
भीष्य उवाच
Bhīṣma warns that treating marriage as a transaction—where payment is assumed to finalize the union—creates serious moral and social defects. A legitimate marriage is grounded in dharma and proper rites/consent, not merely in money or cohabitation.
In Anuśāsana Parva, Bhīṣma is instructing on dharma. Here he addresses the issue of ‘buying and selling’ a maiden (kanyā-kraya-vikraya), urging careful reflection on its faults and stating that a paid ‘fee’ has never been a valid basis for conclusively establishing marriage.