Shloka 121
Śiva-nāmānukīrtana-prastāvaḥ
Prologue to the praise of Śiva and the Upamanyu testimony
तात! इसीलिये वह आटेका रस मुझे प्रिय नहीं लगा; अतः मैंने बालस्वभाववश ही अपनी मातासे कहा-- ।।
tāta! isīliye sa āṭekā rasa mama priyaḥ na lāga; ataḥ mayā bālasvabhāvavaśāt eva svamātāyai uktam—
na idaṃ kṣīrodanaṃ mātari yat tvaṃ me dattavatī asi |
tato mām abravīn mātā duḥkhaśokasamanvitā,
vane nivasatāṃ nityaṃ kandamūlaphalāśinām |
“mā! tvaṃ me yad dattavatī, etat kṣīrodanaṃ na.”
(mādhava!) tataḥ sā mātā duḥkhaśokanimagnā putrasnehāt mām hṛdayena āliṅgya mama mastakaṃ ghrātvā mām abravīt—
“vane nityaṃ nivasantaḥ kandamūla-phalāhārāḥ śuddhāntaraṅgā munayaḥ; teṣāṃ kṣīrodanaṃ kutaḥ syāt?”
Dijo Vāsudeva: «Amado, por eso el sabor de aquella papilla áspera no me agradó. Y así, con la inocencia propia de un niño, dije a mi madre: “Madre, lo que me has dado no es arroz con leche”. Entonces mi madre —vencida por la pena y el dolor— me habló. Abrazándome por afecto materno y aspirando el aroma de mi cabeza, dijo: “Hijo mío, ¿cómo podrían aquellos sabios que viven siempre en el bosque y se sustentan de tubérculos, raíces y frutos, obtener jamás arroz con leche?”»
वासुदेव उवाच
Educational Q&A
The passage highlights contentment and ethical realism: those who live by austere forest-dharma (subsisting on roots and fruits) cannot be judged by standards of luxury. It also underscores compassion—understanding the limits and circumstances of others rather than demanding what is unavailable.
Vāsudeva recalls a childhood moment when he complained to his mother that what he received was not milk-rice. His mother, grieving yet affectionate, explains that forest-dwelling sages who live on simple foods cannot possibly procure milk-rice, gently correcting his childish expectation.