Home›Varaha Purana›Adhyaya 21›Shloka 51
←Previous Verse
Next Verse→

Varaha Purana 21.51: Adhyaya 21, Shloka 51

The Disruption of Dakṣa’s Sacrifice, the Hari-Hara Conflict, and the Establishment of Rudra’s Sacrificial Share

Pūrva Bhāga · Harihara-saṃvāda / Devāsura-yuddha narrative (martial episode)

ततो हरिहरं युद्धमभवल्लोमहर्षणम् । रुद्रः पाशुपतास्त्रेण विव्याध हरिमोजसा । हरिर्नारायणास्त्रेण रुद्रं विव्याध कोपवान् ॥ २१.५२ ॥

Recitation with translationVaraha Purana 21.51

tato hariharaṃ yuddham abhaval lomaharṣaṇam | rudraḥ pāśupatāstreṇa vivyādha harim ojasā | harir nārāyaṇāstreṇa rudraṃ vivyādha kopavān || 21.52 ||

Then there arose a hair-raising battle between Hari and Hara. Rudra, with the Pāśupata weapon, pierced Hari with force; and Hari, wrathful, with the Nārāyaṇa weapon, pierced Rudra.

tataḥthereupon
tataḥ
TypeIndeclinable
FormAvyaya; adverb (ततः=thereupon)
RoleKāla-adhikaraṇa (कालाधिकरण)
Roottataḥ (ततः अव्यय)
hari-haraṃbetween Hari and Hara
hari-haraṃ
TypeAdjective
FormMasculine, Accusative, Singular; द्वन्द्व (समाहार/इतरेतर) used adjectivally qualifying yuddham: “of Hari and Hara”
RoleViśeṣaṇa (विशेषण)
Roothari + hara (प्रातिपदिकानि)
yuddhambattle
yuddham
TypeNoun
FormNeuter (नपुंसकलिङ्ग), Nominative, Singular
RoleKarta (कर्ता)
Rootyuddha (युद्ध प्रातिपदिक)
abhavatarose/occurred
abhavat
TypeVerb
FormImperfect (लङ्), 3rd person, Singular; parasmaipada
RoleKriyā (क्रिया)
Rootbhū (भू धातु)
loma-harṣaṇamhair-raising
loma-harṣaṇam
TypeAdjective
FormNeuter, Nominative, Singular; तत्पुरुष (षष्ठी/कर्मधारय-भाव): “causing hair to bristle” qualifying yuddham
RoleViśeṣaṇa (विशेषण)
Rootloman + harṣaṇa (प्रातिपदिकानि)
rudraḥRudra (Śiva)
rudraḥ
TypeNoun
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
RoleKarta (कर्ता)
Rootrudra (रुद्र प्रातिपदिक)
pāśupata-astreṇawith the Pāśupata weapon
pāśupata-astreṇa
TypeNoun
FormNeuter, Instrumental (3rd/तृतीया), Singular; तत्पुरुष—“Pāśupata weapon”
RoleKaraṇa (करण)
Rootpāśupata + astra (प्रातिपदिकानि)
vivyādhapierced/struck
vivyādha
TypeVerb
FormPerfect (लिट्), 3rd person, Singular; parasmaipada
RoleKriyā (क्रिया)
Rootvyadh (व्यध् धातु)
harimHari
harim
TypeNoun
FormMasculine, Accusative, Singular
RoleKarma (कर्म)
Roothari (हरि प्रातिपदिक)
ojasāwith might
ojasā
TypeNoun
FormNeuter, Instrumental, Singular
RoleKaraṇa (करण)
Rootojas (ओजस् प्रातिपदिक)
hariḥHari
hariḥ
TypeNoun
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
RoleKarta (कर्ता)
Roothari (हरि प्रातिपदिक)
nārāyaṇa-astreṇawith the Nārāyaṇa weapon
nārāyaṇa-astreṇa
TypeNoun
FormNeuter, Instrumental, Singular; तत्पुरुष—“Nārāyaṇa weapon”
RoleKaraṇa (करण)
Rootnārāyaṇa + astra (प्रातिपदिकानि)
rudramRudra
rudram
TypeNoun
FormMasculine, Accusative, Singular
RoleKarma (कर्म)
Rootrudra (रुद्र प्रातिपदिक)
vivyādhapierced/struck
vivyādha
TypeVerb
FormPerfect (लिट्), 3rd person, Singular; parasmaipada
RoleKriyā (क्रिया)
Rootvyadh (व्यध् धातु)
kopavānwrathful
kopavān
TypeAdjective
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular; possessive adjective (मतुप्/वत्) qualifying hariḥ
RoleViśeṣaṇa (विशेषण)
Rootkopa-vat (कोपवत् प्रातिपदिक)
  • abhavat lomaharṣaṇam: final -t + l-
  • harir nārāyaṇāstreṇa: visarga sandhi (hariḥ + nārāyaṇa-)

Raudra and Adbhuta rasaSetting: Cosmic arena
Speaker

Varāha

Kind of teaching
Theological non-dual concord
Subjects
Puranic narrativeMartial theology (divine weapons)Inter-deity conflict motif
Core idea

Even when sectarian deities appear opposed, their powers are mutually matched, implying a higher unity and the limits of rivalry in īśvara-tattva.

In practice

Temper sectarian antagonism; read conflict-myths as pedagogic drama about power, restraint, and cosmic balance.

C
Classical Literature
P
Purāṇa Studies
V
Vaiṣṇavism
Ś
Śaivism
M
Mythic Warfare
S
Sanskrit Philology

FAQs

It exemplifies a Purāṇic narrative technique in which major deities are depicted in conflict through named astras (weapon-mantras), reflecting shared mythic vocabulary across sectarian corpora while remaining part of a literary, not historiographic, register.

No geographic toponym appears in this verse; it is focused on the combat episode and the deployment of the Pāśupata and Nārāyaṇa weapons.

The verse does not present an explicit ethical injunction; its philosophical interest lies in portraying controlled power (ojas) and anger (kopa) as narrative forces, framed through the symbolic use of astras rather than direct moral teaching.

Ask anything about this verse

Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.

Not sure where to start?

A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.

Read Varaha Purana in the Vedapath app

Scan the QR code to open this directly in the app, with word-by-word meanings, Sanskrit recitation where available, and more.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Continue reading in the Vedapath app

Open in App
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play