The Disruption of Dakṣa’s Sacrifice, the Hari-Hara Conflict, and the Establishment of Rudra’s Sacrificial Share
Pūrva Bhāga · Harihara-saṃvāda / Devāsura-yuddha narrative (martial episode)
ततो हरिहरं युद्धमभवल्लोमहर्षणम् । रुद्रः पाशुपतास्त्रेण विव्याध हरिमोजसा । हरिर्नारायणास्त्रेण रुद्रं विव्याध कोपवान् ॥ २१.५२ ॥
tato hariharaṃ yuddham abhaval lomaharṣaṇam | rudraḥ pāśupatāstreṇa vivyādha harim ojasā | harir nārāyaṇāstreṇa rudraṃ vivyādha kopavān || 21.52 ||
tato hariharaM yuddhamabhavallomaharShaNam | rudraH pAshupatAstreNa vivyAdha harimojasA | harirnArAyaNAstreNa rudraM vivyAdha kopavAn || 21.52 ||
Then there arose a hair-raising battle between Hari and Hara. Rudra, with the Pāśupata weapon, pierced Hari with force; and Hari, wrathful, with the Nārāyaṇa weapon, pierced Rudra.
Varāha
Even when sectarian deities appear opposed, their powers are mutually matched, implying a higher unity and the limits of rivalry in īśvara-tattva.
Temper sectarian antagonism; read conflict-myths as pedagogic drama about power, restraint, and cosmic balance.
21.21.53-56 (continuation: astras fight; iconographic contrasts)
It exemplifies a Purāṇic narrative technique in which major deities are depicted in conflict through named astras (weapon-mantras), reflecting shared mythic vocabulary across sectarian corpora while remaining part of a literary, not historiographic, register.
No geographic toponym appears in this verse; it is focused on the combat episode and the deployment of the Pāśupata and Nārāyaṇa weapons.
The verse does not present an explicit ethical injunction; its philosophical interest lies in portraying controlled power (ojas) and anger (kopa) as narrative forces, framed through the symbolic use of astras rather than direct moral teaching.
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.