Shloka 1
Draupadī-apaharaṇa-saṃdeśaḥ
Report of Draupadī’s Abduction and the Pāṇḍavas’ Pursuit
हि मय ० (0) है 7 द्विपज्चाशर्दाधिकद्विशततमो< ध्याय: सर्नेपर दुर्योधन धनको समझाना और कर्णके अनुरोध करनेपर दुयोधनका अनशन त्याग करके हस्तिनापुरको प्रस्थान दानवा ऊचु: भो: सुयोधन राजेन्द्र भरतानां कुलोद्वह । शूरै: परिवृतो नित्यं तथैव च महात्मभि:,दानव बोले--भरतवंशका भार वहन करनेवाले महाराज सुयोधन! आप सदा शूरवीरों तथा महामना पुरुषोंसे घिरे रहते हैं, फिर आपने यह आमरण उपवास करनेका साहस क्यों किया है? आत्महत्या करनेवाला पुरुष तो अधोगतिको प्राप्त होता है और लोकमें उसकी निन््दा होती है, जो अयश फैलानेवाली है
vaiśaṃpāyana uvāca — dānavā ūcuḥ: bhoḥ suyodhana rājendra bharatānāṃ kulodvaha | śūraiḥ parivṛto nityaṃ tathaiva ca mahātmabhiḥ ||
Vaiśampāyana said: The Dānavas spoke—“O Suyodhana, king among rulers, upholder of the Bharata lineage! You are always surrounded by heroes and by great-souled men. Why, then, did you dare to undertake a fast unto death? A man who destroys himself falls to a lower state, and in the world he earns blame—spreading only ill-fame.”
वैशम्पायन उवाच
Educational Q&A
The passage frames self-destruction (or a death-fast undertaken in despair) as ethically blameworthy: it leads to a ‘lower state’ and public censure. For a king charged with upholding a lineage, endurance and responsible action are presented as superior to self-harm motivated by frustration or wounded pride.
In Vana Parva, Adhyaya 253, the Dānavas address Duryodhana (Suyodhana). Noting that he is supported by brave and noble allies, they question why he attempted an ‘āmarana’ fast (fasting unto death) and warn him about the disgrace and negative consequences associated with self-killing.