क्षेत्र सुकृष्टे हुपिते च बीजे देवे च वर्षत्यूतुकालयुक्तम् । न स्यात् फलं तस्य कुतः प्रसिद्धि- रन्यत्र दैवादिति चिन्तयामि,“मैं सोचता हूँ कि अच्छी तरह जोते हुए खेतमें बीज बोया जाय तथा ऋतुके अनुसार ठीक समयपर वर्षा भी हो, फिर भी उसमें फल न लगे, तो इसमें प्रारब्धके अतिरिक्त अन्य किसी कारणकी सिद्धि कैसे की जा सकती है?
kṣetre sukṛṣṭe hūpite ca bīje deve ca varṣaty ṛtukālayuktam | na syāt phalaṃ tasya kutaḥ prasiddhir anyatra daivād iti cintayāmi ||
Vaiśampāyana said: “Even when a field is well ploughed, the seed properly sown, and the rain-god sends showers in the right season, if the crop still bears no fruit—how could one establish any cause for that failure other than destiny? This is what I reflect upon.”
वैशम्पायन उवाच
The verse uses an agrarian metaphor to argue that even when all visible causes—effort, proper method, and timely rain—are present, failure can still occur; therefore an unseen factor, called daiva (destiny/previously ripened karma), must be acknowledged alongside human endeavor.
Vaiśampāyana, as narrator, presents a reflective maxim: he reasons about why outcomes sometimes do not match careful preparation, concluding that destiny (daiva) is the decisive explanation when ordinary causes appear complete.