Shloka 120
Śuka’s Guṇa-Transcendence and Vyāsa’s Consolation (शुकगति-वर्णनम्)
जातमात्रं तु तद्गरूपं दृष्टवा ताम्रनखाड्गुलि । कौमारं रूपमापन्नं रूपतो नोपलभ्यते
jātamātraṃ tu tad rūpaṃ dṛṣṭvā tāmranakhāṅguli | kaumāraṃ rūpam āpannaṃ rūpato nopalabhyate ||
Bhishma said: “When a child is just born, the form that is seen has nails and fingers reddish like copper. But when he reaches boyhood, that earlier appearance is no longer perceived. Thus, outward form is unstable and continually changes with time.”
भीष्य उवाच
Educational Q&A
Bhishma highlights the impermanence of bodily appearance: what seems defining at birth vanishes in later stages. The ethical implication is to avoid pride or attachment based on external form and to value enduring qualities aligned with dharma.
In Shanti Parva, Bhishma instructs on wisdom and right understanding. Here he uses a simple observation about a child’s changing appearance—from newborn to boyhood—to illustrate how the body’s form is not constant and should not be treated as the basis of lasting identity.