Shloka 104
Śuka’s Guṇa-Transcendence and Vyāsa’s Consolation (शुकगति-वर्णनम्)
जैसे प्रत्यक्ष दर्शनमें ये तीन हेतु हैं, उसी प्रकार अन्यान्य ज्ञान और ज्ञेयमें भी तीन-तीन हेतु जानने चाहिये। ज्ञान और ज्ञातव्य विषयोंके बीचमें किसी ज्ञानेन्द्रियके अतिरिक्त मन नामक एक दूसरा गुण भी रहता है, जिससे यह जीवात्मा किसी विषयमें भले-बुरेका निश्चय करनेके लिये विचार करता है ।।
yathā pratyakṣa-darśane ime trayo hetavaḥ, tathā anyeṣv api jñāna-jñeyayoḥ trīn trīn hetūn vijānīyāt. jñāna-jñātavya-viṣayayoḥ madhye indriyebhyaḥ pṛthag manaḥ nāma dvitīyo guṇaḥ api tiṣṭhati, yena ayam jīvātmā viṣayeṣu śubha-aśubha-viniścayārthaṃ vicārayati. dvādaśas tv aparaḥ tatra buddhiḥ nāma guṇaḥ smṛtaḥ, yena saṃśaya-pūrveṣu boddhavyeṣu vyavasyati.
Bhīṣma said: “Just as direct perception depends on three causes, so too in other forms of knowing and in the objects to be known one should recognize three causes each. Between knowledge and its object there is, besides the sense-faculties, another factor called mind; through it the individual self reflects in order to decide what is good or bad regarding a given matter. And there is yet another, the twelfth factor, remembered as ‘intellect’ (buddhi): by it, when doubt arises about something that must be understood, a person arrives at a settled conclusion.”
भीष्य उवाच
Educational Q&A
Cognition is explained through distinct inner faculties: the mind (manas) deliberates about an object—especially regarding good and bad—while the intellect (buddhi) resolves doubt and reaches a firm determination. This analysis extends the idea that knowledge depends on multiple causal factors, not merely the senses.
In Shanti Parva’s instructional discourse, Bhishma continues a philosophical explanation to Yudhishthira, classifying the components involved in knowing. He distinguishes the roles of the senses, mind, and intellect as part of a broader enumeration of factors (guṇas/tattvas) used to understand ethical judgment and certainty.