Shloka 24
Bhūta-guṇa-saṃkhyāna
Enumeration of the Properties of the Elements and Cognitive Faculties
जैसे मछली जलसे भिन्न है, फिर भी वे एक दूसरेसे संयुक्त रहते हैं। जैसे गूलर और उसके कीड़े एक दूसरेसे पृथक हैं तथापि परस्पर संयुक्त रहते हैं। उसी प्रकार बुद्धि और क्षेत्रञको भी समझना चाहिये ।।
īṣīkā vā yathā muñje pṛthak ca saha caiva ca | tathaiva sahitāv etāv anyonyasmin pratiṣṭhitau ||
Vyāsa said: As a reed-fibre (īṣīkā) within a muñja-grass stalk is distinct from it and yet remains together with it, so too should one understand the relation of buddhi (discriminative intellect) and the kṣetrajña (the knower of the field). Though different in essence, they abide in close conjunction, each resting upon the other in lived experience—an image meant to sharpen discernment between the changing instruments of cognition and the witnessing self.
व्यास उवाच
Educational Q&A
The verse teaches viveka: buddhi (the changing instrument of understanding) and the kṣetrajña (the witnessing knower) are distinct in nature, yet appear conjoined in embodied life. One should not confuse the self with the operations of intellect, even though experience presents them as mutually connected.
In Śānti Parva’s philosophical instruction, Vyāsa explains the relation between inner faculties and the self using a concrete metaphor (reed-fibre and muñja stalk), guiding the listener toward a clearer grasp of the self as separate from, yet associated with, the cognitive apparatus.