Shloka 27
Adhyāya 166: Kṛtaghna-doṣa (कृतघ्नदोषः) — the fault of ingratitude and the limits of expiation
उदपानोदके ग्रामे ब्राह्मणो वृषलीपति: । उषित्वा द्वादश समा: शूद्रकर्मेव गच्छति
udapānodake grāme brāhmaṇo vṛṣalīpatiḥ | uṣitvā dvādaśa samāḥ śūdrakarmāiva gacchati ||
Bhishma said: In a village where all drink from the same well-water, a Brahmin who becomes the husband of a Śūdra woman and lives there for twelve years comes to be regarded as one who follows the conduct and occupation of a Śūdra. The verse frames social identity as shaped by sustained association, marriage, and livelihood, warning that long-term immersion in non-Brahminical modes of life leads to a corresponding shift in one’s recognized varṇa-status and duties.
भीष्म उवाच
Educational Q&A
The verse teaches that varṇa-identity and eligibility for particular dharmas are not treated as merely nominal; sustained association, marriage alliance, and long-term residence within a community—together with adopting its customary occupations—can lead society to regard a person as having shifted into that community’s mode of life and duties.
In the Śānti Parva’s dharma-instruction, Bhishma is laying down a rule-like observation about social status: a Brahmin who marries a Śūdra woman and lives for twelve years in a village characterized by common use of a single well is said to ‘go to’ (i.e., be classed as) one following Śūdra conduct/occupation.