मृदु-तीक्ष्ण-नीति तथा दुष्टलक्षण-विज्ञानम्
Measured Policy and the Recognition of Malicious Disposition
ब॒हस्पतिरुवाच परोक्षमगुणानाह सदगुणानभ्यसूयते । परैर्वा कीर्त्यमानेषु तृष्णीमास्ते पराड्मुख:
bṛhaspatir uvāca parokṣam aguṇān āha sadguṇān abhyasūyate | parair vā kīrtyamāneṣu tṛṣṇīm āste parāṅmukhaḥ ||
Bṛhaspati said: “He is deemed wicked who, behind a person’s back, speaks only of faults; who even finds fault with that person’s genuine virtues; and who, when others are praising those virtues, turns away and sits in silence. Such conduct reveals envy and a settled hostility toward goodness.”
भीष्म उवाच
A person’s moral corruption is shown by three signs: speaking of others’ faults in their absence, fault-finding even with genuine virtues, and refusing to acknowledge goodness when others praise it—silence and turning away here indicate envy and hostility to virtue.
Within Bhīṣma’s discourse in Śānti Parva, a saying attributed to Bṛhaspati is cited as an ethical maxim, defining the behavior by which a ‘duṣṭa’ (wicked person) can be recognized—especially through how they speak about others’ qualities.