Previous Verse
Next Verse

Mahabharata — Shalya Parva, Shloka 106

यथाहं भीमसेनेन व्युत्क्रम्य समयं हतः । “मेरे पक्षके वीरोंमेंसे जो लोग इस युद्धमें जीवित बच गये हों, उन्हें यह बताना कि भीमसेनने किस तरह गदायुद्धके नियमका उल्लंघन करके मुझे मारा

yathāhaṃ bhīmasenena vyutkramya samayaṃ hataḥ |

Sañjaya said: “How I was slain by Bhīmasena after he transgressed the agreed rule (of the mace-fight).” The line frames the killing as ethically tainted: the speaker presents his death not merely as defeat in combat, but as the result of a breach of the mutually accepted code governing the duel.

यथाas, in the manner that
यथा:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootयथा
अहम्I
अहम्:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootअस्मद्
FormNominative, Singular
भीमसेनेनby Bhimasena
भीमसेनेन:
Karana
TypeNoun
Rootभीमसेन
FormMasculine, Instrumental, Singular
व्युत्क्रम्यhaving transgressed, having violated
व्युत्क्रम्य:
TypeVerb
Rootव्युत्क्रम्
FormLyap (absolutive/gerund), Parasmaipada (usage)
समयम्the agreement, the rule/compact
समयम्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootसमय
FormMasculine, Accusative, Singular
हतःkilled, slain
हतः:
TypeVerb
Rootहन्
FormKta (past passive participle), Masculine, Nominative, Singular

संजय उवाच

S
Sañjaya
B
Bhīmasena

Educational Q&A

The verse highlights the moral weight of agreed norms in warfare: victory gained by violating a mutually accepted rule is portrayed as ethically compromised, raising questions about dharma in extreme conflict.

In the context of the climactic mace duel, the speaker characterizes his death as caused by Bhīmasena’s breach of the duel’s agreed conventions, emphasizing that the killing occurred through a rule-violation rather than straightforward adherence to combat protocol.