Vṛddha-kanyā-carita and Balarāma’s Kurukṣetra Inquiry (वृद्धकन्या-चरितम् / कुरुक्षेत्रफल-प्रश्नः)
यद्वैतेषां भवेद् योग्यं वधाय विबुधद्विषाम् । परंतु भगवान् शक्र उस समय ऐसा कोई हथियार न पा सके, जो उन देदवद्रोहियोंके वधके लिये उपयोगी हो सके
yad vai teṣāṃ bhaved yogyaṃ vadhāya vibudhadvīṣām | parantu bhagavān śakraḥ tasmin samaye tādṛśaṃ kiñcid āyudhaṃ na prāpa, yat teṣāṃ devadrohiṇāṃ vadhāya upayogī syāt ||
Vaiśaṃpāyana said: “Whatever might have been suitable for the slaying of those who hate the gods, even the blessed Śakra, at that time, could not find any weapon that would truly serve to destroy those traitors to the devas.”
वैशम्पायन उवाच
Even divine authority is not automatically effective without the right means: righteous intent alone does not guarantee success. The verse highlights the ethical tension that punishment of grave wrongdoing (betrayal of the devas/cosmic order) still depends on appropriate instruments and circumstances.
The narrator Vaiśaṃpāyana describes a moment when Indra (Śakra), despite being the chief of the gods, cannot find a weapon suitable to kill certain enemies of the devas. The scene underscores the seriousness of the adversaries and the narrative need for a specific, destined means of their defeat.