Shloka 653

जैगीषव्ये तपो नास्ति विस्मापयति यो5सितम्‌ । तदनन्तर मुनिश्रेष्ठ नारदने देवताओंसे कहा--'जैगीषव्यमें तपस्या नहीं है; क्योंकि ये असित मुनिको अपना प्रभाव दिखाकर आश्चर्यमें डाल रहे हैं

jaigīṣavye tapo nāsti vismāpayati yo 'sitam | tadanantaram muniśreṣṭho nārado devatābhyaḥ uvāca—“jaigīṣavye tapasyā nāsti; yataḥ sa asitaṃ muniṃ svaprabhāvena darśayitvā vismāpayati” |

Vaiśaṃpāyana said: “In Jaigīṣavya there is no true austerity, for he is merely astonishing the sage Asita by displaying his own power.” After this, the foremost of sages, Nārada, addressed the gods, saying: “Jaigīṣavya’s practice is not genuine tapas; he is only using his influence to dazzle Asita into wonder.” The passage contrasts authentic ascetic discipline—rooted in restraint and humility—with the show of supernatural prowess meant to impress others.

जैगीषव्येin (the person) Jaigīṣavya
जैगीषव्ये:
Adhikarana
TypeNoun
Rootजैगीषव्य
FormMasculine, Locative, Singular
तपःausterity, penance
तपः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootतपस्
FormNeuter, Nominative, Singular
not
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
अस्तिis/exists
अस्ति:
TypeVerb
Rootअस्
FormPresent, Third, Singular, Parasmaipada
विस्मापयतिastonishes, causes to marvel
विस्मापयति:
TypeVerb
Rootविस्मापय् (विस्मि + णिच्)
FormPresent, Third, Singular, Parasmaipada
यःwho
यः:
Karta
TypePronoun
Rootयद्
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
असितम्Asita (the sage)
असितम्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootअसित
FormMasculine, Accusative, Singular

वैशम्पायन उवाच

V
Vaiśaṃpāyana
J
Jaigīṣavya
A
Asita
N
Nārada
D
Devatās (the gods)

Educational Q&A

The passage warns that true tapas is not the exhibition of extraordinary powers to impress others. Authentic ascetic discipline is measured by inner restraint, sincerity, and humility; using spiritual potency to create amazement is portrayed as lacking genuine austerity.

Vaiśaṃpāyana reports a judgment about Jaigīṣavya: he is said to lack real tapas because he is astonishing the sage Asita by showing his power. Then Nārada, the foremost sage, conveys this assessment to the gods, framing the event as a critique of performative spirituality.