Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 3

Sārasvata–Dadhīca Upākhyāna at Sarasvatī Tīrtha

Balarāma’s Pilgrimage Context

अक्रोधनो महाराज तुल्यनिन्दात्मसंस्तुति: । प्रियाप्रिये तुल्यवृत्ति्यमवत्समदर्शन:

akrodhano mahārāja tulya-nindātma-saṁstutiḥ | priyāpriye tulya-vṛttir yama-vat sama-darśanaḥ ||

Vaiśampāyana said: “O King, he was free from anger. He regarded censure and praise as equal. In the gain of what is pleasant and what is unpleasant, his mental disposition remained the same. Like Yama, he looked upon all with an even, impartial gaze.”

अक्रोधनःfree from anger
अक्रोधनः:
Karta
TypeAdjective
Rootअक्रोधन
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
महाराजO great king
महाराज:
Adhikarana
TypeNoun
Rootमहाराज
FormMasculine, Vocative, Singular
तुल्यequal(ly)
तुल्य:
Karma
TypeAdjective
Rootतुल्य
FormNeuter, Accusative, Singular
निन्दाblame, censure
निन्दा:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootनिन्दा
FormFeminine, Accusative, Singular
आत्मof oneself
आत्म:
Adhikarana
TypeNoun
Rootआत्मन्
FormMasculine, Genitive, Singular
संस्तुतिःpraise, commendation
संस्तुतिः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootसंस्तुति
FormFeminine, Nominative, Singular
प्रियin what is pleasant
प्रिय:
Adhikarana
TypeAdjective
Rootप्रिय
FormNeuter, Locative, Singular
अप्रियin what is unpleasant
अप्रिय:
Adhikarana
TypeAdjective
Rootअप्रिय
FormNeuter, Locative, Singular
तुल्यequal, same
तुल्य:
Karta
TypeAdjective
Rootतुल्य
FormFeminine, Nominative, Singular
वृत्तिःmental disposition, attitude
वृत्तिः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootवृत्ति
FormFeminine, Nominative, Singular
यमवत्like Yama
यमवत्:
Karana
TypeIndeclinable
Rootयमवत्
Formtrue
समदर्शनःone whose view is impartial
समदर्शनः:
Karta
TypeAdjective
Rootसमदर्शन
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular

वैशम्पायन उवाच

V
Vaiśampāyana
Y
Yama

Educational Q&A

The verse praises the ethical ideal of equanimity: freedom from anger, equal regard for praise and blame, steadiness amid pleasant and unpleasant outcomes, and impartiality toward all—qualities associated with dharmic self-mastery and just conduct.

Vaiśampāyana is describing a person’s character to the king, highlighting inner discipline and impartial judgment. The comparison to Yama underscores a standard of fairness and even-handedness rather than emotional reactivity.