च्यवन-कुशिक-संवादः
Cyavana–Kuśika Dialogue on Hospitality, Service, and Lineage Questions
पुत्रकामो हि पुत्रार्थे यां वृणीते विशाम्पते । क्षेत्रजं तु प्रमाणं स्यान्न वै तत्रात्मज: सुत:
putrakāmo hi putrārthe yāṁ vṛṇīte viśāmpate | kṣetrajāṁ tu pramāṇaṁ syān na vai tatrātmajaḥ sutaḥ prajānātha |
Bhīṣma said: “O lord of the people, a man who desires a son, when he accepts a woman already pregnant specifically for the sake of obtaining offspring, the child born from that womb is to be legally recognized as the son of the husband (the one who married her). In that case, the begetter has no claim there; the son is not treated as the begetter’s own, but as the husband’s son according to the rule of kṣetraja lineage.”
भीष्म उवाच
The verse states a dharma-legal principle: when a man marries a woman already pregnant specifically to obtain a child, the child is recognized as the husband’s son (kṣetraja), and the biological begetter has no paternal claim.
In Bhīṣma’s instruction on dharma in the Anuśāsana Parva, he explains rules of sonship and lineage classification, clarifying who is considered the rightful father in a kṣetraja-type situation.