Shloka 4
Bhaṅgāśvanopākhyāna — On comparative affection in strī–puruṣa union (भङ्गाश्वनोपाख्यानम्)
अग्निष्ठृतं स राजर्षिरिन्द्रद्धिष्ट महाबल: । प्रायक्षित्तेषु मर्त्यानां पुत्रकामेषु चेष्यते
agniṣṭhṛtaṃ sa rājarṣir indraddhiṣṭa mahābalaḥ | prāyaścitteṣu martyānāṃ putrakāmeṣu ceṣyate ||
Bhishma said: “That mighty royal sage performed the sacrifice called Agniṣṭhṛta. Because Indra was not given the foremost place in it, Indra bore hostility toward that rite. Yet among mortals this sacrifice is regarded as a desired observance—undertaken as an expiation for faults and also by those who seek a son.”
भीष्म उवाच
Educational Q&A
The verse highlights how ritual acts can serve ethical repair (prāyaścitta) and legitimate human aims (such as seeking offspring), while also warning that neglecting due honor within a sacred framework can provoke conflict—even with divine powers—thus stressing propriety and balance in dharmic practice.
Bhishma describes a royal sage who performed the Agniṣṭhṛta sacrifice. Indra became hostile because he was not accorded primacy in that rite. Despite Indra’s displeasure, the sacrifice is presented as a valued human practice for expiation and for those desiring a son.