आभ्यन्तरध्यान-तत्त्वगणना-चतुर्व्यूहयोगः
Adhyaya 28
ततो बहुविधं प्रोक्तं चिन्त्यं तत्रास्ति चेद्यतः चिन्तकस्य ततश्चिन्ता अन्यथा नोपपद्यते
tato bahuvidhaṃ proktaṃ cintyaṃ tatrāsti cedyataḥ cintakasya tataścintā anyathā nopapadyate
Therefore the object fit for contemplation has been taught in many ways; for if there truly exists something to be contemplated, then in the contemplator—the bound soul, paśu—contemplation must arise from that very reality; otherwise such contemplation could not be accounted for.
Suta Goswami
It grounds linga-upāsanā in a Shaiva epistemology: the very possibility of sustained Shiva-cintana implies a real contemplable principle—Śiva as Pati—toward whom the mind and worship are directed.
It implies Shiva-tattva as an objectively real ‘cintya’ (knowable/meditatable) principle; the paśu’s cognition and contemplation are meaningful because they arise in relation to that existent reality, not from mere imagination.
Shiva-cintana (continuous contemplative recollection of Pati) as a Pāśupata-oriented discipline supporting puja and inner yoga—turning the paśu’s mind away from pāśa (bondage) toward the contemplable Lord.