स सत्त्रिभिः शपथपूर्वमेकैकममात्यमुपजापयेत् अधार्मिको अयं राजा साधु धार्मिकमन्यमस्य तत्कुलीनमपरुद्धं कुल्यमेकप्रग्रहं सामन्तमाटविकमौपपादिकं वा प्रतिपादयामः सर्वेषामेतद् रोचते कथं वा तव इति ॥ कZ_०१.१०.०३ ॥
sa sattribhiḥ śapathapūrvam ekaikam amātyam upajāpayet: adhārmiko ayaṃ rājā; sādhu dhārmikam anyam asya tatkulīnam aparuddhaṃ kulyam ekapragrahaṃ sāmantam āṭavikam aupapādikaṃ vā pratipādayāmaḥ; sarveṣām etad rocate—kathaṃ vā tava? iti
Through sattri-agents, after administering an oath, he should privately sound out each minister: ‘This king is unrighteous. Let us install another—righteous—person: one of his own lineage, or a confined kinsman, or a collateral relative, or a single-pledge claimant, or a frontier vassal, or a forest chieftain, or even an adopted/introduced substitute. Everyone approves this; what about you?’
It probes what type of regime-change coalition the minister finds plausible—dynastic, aristocratic, frontier-military, or extra-legal—revealing both ambition and network orientation.
It increases psychological commitment and candor, while also generating a recordable breach if the target agrees to treasonous propositions.