HomeVamana PuranaAdh. 33Shloka 42
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Vamana Purana — Ritadhvaja Aids Galava, Shloka 42

Ritadhvaja’s Aid to Galava and Andhaka’s Infatuation with Gauri

आदाय वज्रं बलवान् मघवानिव गणेश्वरः

ādāya vajraṃ balavān maghavāniva gaṇeśvaraḥ

Den Vajra ergreifend, erschien der mächtige Gaṇeśvara wie Maghavān (Indra).

ādāyahaving taken
ādāya:
Kriyāviśeṣaṇa (क्रियाविशेषणम्)
TypeVerb
Rootā-√dā (धातु)
Formक्त्वान्त (Gerund/Absolutive), उपसर्गः आ-, ‘having taken’ (पूर्वकाले कृत्य)
vajramthe thunderbolt
vajram:
Karma (कर्म)
TypeNoun
Rootvajra (प्रातिपदिक)
Formनपुंसकलिङ्ग, द्वितीया-विभक्ति (Accusative), एकवचन
balavānpowerful
balavān:
Karta (कर्ता)
TypeAdjective
Rootbalavat (प्रातिपदिक)
Formपुंलिङ्ग, प्रथमा-विभक्ति (Nominative), एकवचन; विशेषणम्
maghavānMaghavan (Indra)
maghavān:
Upamāna (उपमान)
TypeNoun
Rootmaghavat (प्रातिपदिक)
Formपुंलिङ्ग, प्रथमा-विभक्ति, एकवचन; इन्द्रस्य नाम
ivalike/as
iva:
Sambandha (सम्बन्ध/उपमा-सूचक)
TypeIndeclinable
Rootiva (अव्यय)
Formउपमावाचक-अव्यय (particle of comparison)
gaṇeśvaraḥGaṇeśvara (Lord of the gaṇas)
gaṇeśvaraḥ:
Karta (कर्ता)
TypeNoun
Rootgaṇa + īśvara (प्रातिपदिक)
Formषष्ठी-तत्पुरुष (gaṇānām īśvaraḥ), पुंलिङ्ग, प्रथमा-विभक्ति, एकवचन
Narrator describing the arming of the gaṇa-lord in the battle sequence.
Indra (by comparison)Śiva (implied via gaṇas)Gaṇeśvara
Martial imageryDivine weaponryIndraic comparison (upamā)Protection of the Devī/Śiva’s host

{ "primaryRasa": "vira", "secondaryRasa": "adbhuta", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }

FAQs

The vajra is paradigmatically Indra’s weapon. By stating that Gaṇeśvara takes up a vajra and resembles Maghavān, the text heightens his martial stature and frames him with Indra-like sovereignty in battle.

Not necessarily. Purāṇas frequently use ‘vajra’ generically for a thunderbolt-like weapon and employ Indra as a benchmark for heroic comparison. Literal ownership depends on surrounding verses not included here.

It is a poetic upamā that signals: (1) overwhelming power, (2) a celestial standard of kingship/command, and (3) the legitimacy of the defender’s force against the attackers.