Vamana Purana — Ritadhvaja Aids Galava, Shloka 29
Ritadhvaja’s Aid to Galava and Andhaka’s Infatuation with Gauri
किञ्चित् त्वया न श्रुतं दैत्यनाथ गीतं श्लोकं गाधिना पार्थिवेन दृष्ट्वा सैन्यं विप्रधेनुप्रसक्तं तथ्यं पथ्यं सर्वलोके हितं च // वम्प्_33.28 वरं प्राणास्त्याज्या न च पिशुनवादेष्वभिरतिः वरं मौनं कार्यं न च वचनमुक्तं यदनृतम् वरं क्लीबैर्भाव्यं न च परकगलत्राभिगमनं वरं भिक्षार्थित्वं न च परधनास्वादमसकृत्
kiñcit tvayā na śrutaṃ daityanātha gītaṃ ślokaṃ gādhinā pārthivena dṛṣṭvā sainyaṃ vipradhenuprasaktaṃ tathyaṃ pathyaṃ sarvaloke hitaṃ ca // VamP_33.28 varaṃ prāṇāstyājyā na ca piśunavādeṣvabhiratiḥ varaṃ maunaṃ kāryaṃ na ca vacanamuktaṃ yadanṛtam varaṃ klībairbhāvyaṃ na ca parakagalatrābhigamanaṃ varaṃ bhikṣārthitvaṃ na ca paradhanāsvādamasakṛt
O Herr der Daityas, hast du nicht wenigstens ein wenig von jenem Vers gehört, den König Gādhi sang—wahr, heilsam und der ganzen Welt zuträglich—als er ein Heer sah, das darauf aus war, die Kuh eines Brāhmaṇa (an sich zu reißen)? „Besser ist es, das Leben hinzugeben, als sich an verleumderischer Rede zu ergötzen. Besser ist es, Schweigen zu üben, als unwahre Worte auszusprechen. Besser ist es, für kraftlos zu gelten, als zur Frau eines anderen zu gehen. Besser ist es, vom Betteln zu leben, als immer wieder fremdes Vermögen zu genießen.“
{ "primaryRasa": "shanta", "secondaryRasa": "vira", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
FAQs
Gādhi functions as an authoritative exemplar of royal nīti: a king who recognizes that social order collapses when the vulnerable (brāhmaṇas) and their livelihood (the cow) are violated. ‘Vipra-dhenu’ is a stock marker of grievous adharma; the verse frames ethics as universally beneficial (sarvaloke hitam), not merely sectarian counsel.
It is a graded rhetorical preference (varaṃ…varaṃ…): it ranks harms to show that certain transgressions—slander, lying, adultery, and repeated appropriation of others’ wealth—are worse than socially painful alternatives. The point is ethical prioritization, not a literal injunction to seek death or beggary.
Prahlāda’s strategy is moral suasion: he confronts Daitya kingship with universally intelligible dharma (truthful speech, restraint, non-violation of others). The narrative tension is that such counsel, though ‘pathya’, provokes the tyrant’s rage rather than reform.