Shloka 13
वालिवधः — Vālī’s Fall and Dharma-Accusation
Kiṣkindhā Sarga 17
तं दृष्ट्वा राघवं वाली लक्ष्मणं च महाबलम्।अब्रवीत्प्रश्रितं वाक्यं परुषं धर्मसंहितम्।।त्वं नराधिपतेः पुत्रः प्रथितः प्रियदर्शनःकुलीनस्सत्त्वसम्पन्न स्तेजस्वी चरितव्रतः।।।।पराङ्मुखवधं कृत्वा कोऽत्र प्राप्तस्त्वया गुणः।यदहं युद्धसंरब्धश्शरेणोरसि ताडित:।।
taṃ dṛṣṭvā rāghavaṃ vālī lakṣmaṇaṃ ca mahābalam |
abravīt praśritaṃ vākyaṃ paruṣaṃ dharmasaṃhitam ||
tvaṃ narādhipateḥ putraḥ prathitaḥ priyadarśanaḥ |
kulīnaḥ sattvasaṃpannaḥ tejasvī caritavrataḥ ||
parāṅmukhavadhaṃ kṛtvā ko ’tra prāptas tvayā guṇaḥ |
yad ahaṃ yuddhasaṃrabdhaḥ śareṇorasi tāḍitaḥ ||
Als Vālī Rāghava und den überaus mächtigen Lakṣmaṇa erblickte, redete er ihn mit demütigen, doch scharfen, vom Dharma getragenen Worten an: „Du bist der Sohn eines Königs—berühmt und lieblich anzuschauen; von edler Herkunft, reich an Tugend, strahlend an Kraft und standhaft in rechter Lebensführung. Welches Verdienst hast du hier erlangt, indem du einen tötetest, der dir nicht zugewandt war, da ich, im Kampf entbrannt, von einem Pfeil in die Brust getroffen wurde?“
On seeing powerful Rama and Lakshmana approaching,Vali spoke with pride and rigteousness to Rama, 'You are a prince, born of a noble family, son of a renowned king. You are famous, brilliant, handsome and follower of good practices.Having hit me when I was engaged otherwise in an encounter what merit have you gained?'
FAQs
It raises the dharmic scrutiny of warfare: whether striking an opponent who is not directly facing the attacker can be justified as righteous action.
Mortally wounded, Vālī confronts Rāma and challenges the morality of Rāma’s hidden shot, initiating a formal dharma-argument.
Vālī emphasizes Rāma’s royal virtues and vows, using them as the standard against which Rāma’s act must be judged—highlighting the ideal of consistency between reputation and conduct.