किं गयापिंडदानेन काश्यां वा मरणेन किम् । किं कुरुक्षेत्रदानेन प्रयागे मुंडनं यदि ॥ १०६ ॥
kiṃ gayāpiṃḍadānena kāśyāṃ vā maraṇena kim | kiṃ kurukṣetradānena prayāge muṃḍanaṃ yadi || 106 ||
Wenn wahre innere Bhakti und rechtes Verhalten fehlen, wozu taugt dann das Darbringen von Piṇḍas in Gayā oder gar das Sterben in Kāśī? Wozu taugt das Spenden in Kurukṣetra oder das Scheren in Prayāga?
Narada (teaching in a Tirtha-Mahatmya/ritual-critique tone, within the Narada–Sanatkumara dialogue framework)
Vrata: none
Primary Rasa: shanta
Secondary Rasa: raudra
It warns that famous pilgrimage acts (piṇḍa at Gayā, death at Kāśī, charity at Kurukṣetra, tonsure at Prayāga) become spiritually fruitless when performed as mere externals without the essential inner transformation—faith, purity, and dharmic living.
By implying that liberation-oriented merit does not arise from location-based rites alone; it depends on sincere devotion and right intention—Bhakti and inner surrender are presented as the core that makes any tirtha practice meaningful.
It indirectly critiques ritual formalism: external saṃskāra-style acts (like muṇḍana/tonsure) and śrāddha-related offerings (piṇḍa-dāna) must be aligned with dharma and intent—emphasizing correct ritual purpose rather than merely technical performance.