Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 2

जामदग्न्यस्य विलापः, प्रतिज्ञा, क्षत्रिय-निग्रहः, दानयज्ञश्च

Jāmadagnya Rāma’s Lament, Vow, Kṣatriya Suppression, and Gifts

धर्मज्ञस्य कथं तात वर्तमानस्य सत्पथे । मृत्युरेवंविधो युक्त: सर्वभूतेष्वनागस:,पिताजी! आप तो धर्मज्ञ होनेके साथ ही सन्मार्गपर चलनेवाले थे, कभी किसी भी प्राणीके प्रति कोई अपराध नहीं करते थे, फिर आपकी ऐसी मृत्यु कैसे उचित हो सकती है?

dharmajñasya kathaṃ tāta vartamānasya satpathe | mṛtyur evaṃvidho yuktaḥ sarvabhūteṣv anāgasaḥ ||

Rāma sprach: „Vater, wie kann ein solcher Tod für jemanden passend sein, der das Dharma kennt und auf dem rechten Pfad lebt—der allen Wesen gegenüber schuldlos ist? Wie könnte das gerecht sein?“

धर्मज्ञस्यof the knower of dharma
धर्मज्ञस्य:
Sambandha
TypeAdjective
Rootधर्मज्ञ
FormMasculine, Genitive, Singular
कथम्how
कथम्:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootकथम्
तातO dear father
तात:
TypeNoun
Rootतात
FormMasculine, Vocative, Singular
वर्तमानस्यof one who is abiding/acting (present participle)
वर्तमानस्य:
Sambandha
TypeAdjective
Rootवर्तमान
FormMasculine, Genitive, Singular
सत्पथेon the good path
सत्पथे:
Adhikarana
TypeNoun
Rootसत्पथ
FormMasculine, Locative, Singular
मृत्युःdeath
मृत्युः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootमृत्यु
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
एवंविधःof such a kind
एवंविधः:
Karta
TypeAdjective
Rootएवंविध
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
युक्तःproper/justified
युक्तः:
TypeAdjective
Rootयुक्त
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
सर्वभूतेषुtowards/in all beings
सर्वभूतेषु:
Adhikarana
TypeNoun
Rootसर्वभूत
FormNeuter, Locative, Plural
अनागसःblameless, without offense
अनागसः:
Karta
TypeAdjective
Rootअनागस्
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular

राम उवाच

R
Rāma
F
Father (tāta)

Educational Q&A

The verse voices a dharmic problem: why do the righteous and blameless suffer seemingly unjust outcomes? It highlights the tension between moral conduct (satpatha, anāgasaḥ) and the apparent unfairness of worldly events, prompting reflection on karma, destiny, and the limits of human judgment about justice.

Rāma addresses his father in grief and disbelief, asserting that his father was a knower of dharma and harmless to all beings, and therefore questioning how such a death could be ‘fitting.’ The line functions as a lament and a moral protest within the story’s unfolding tragedy.