Shloka 67
Adhyāya 45 — Duryodhana’s Distress, Śakuni’s Counsel, and the Summons for Dyūta
गते द्वारवतीं कृष्णे सात्वतप्रवरे नूप,राजन! यदुवंशशिरोमणि श्रीकृष्णके द्वारका चले जानेपर भी राजा दुर्योधन तथा सुबलपुत्र शकुनि--ये दोनों नरश्रेष्ठ उस दिव्य सभाभवनमें ही रहे
gate dvāravatīṁ kṛṣṇe sātvata-pravare nṛpa, rājan! yaduvaṁśa-śiromaṇi śrī-kṛṣṇe dvārakāṁ cale jāne’pi rājā duryodhanaḥ saubala-putraḥ śakuniś ca—etau dvau nara-śreṣṭhau tasmin divye sabhā-bhavane eva remāte.
Vaiśampāyana sprach: Als Kṛṣṇa—der Vortrefflichste unter den Sātvatas, das Kronjuwel des Yadu-Geschlechts—nach Dvāravatī aufgebrochen war, o König, blieben, obwohl Śrī Kṛṣṇa bereits nach Dvārakā aufgebrochen war, König Duryodhana und Śakuni, der Sohn Subalas—beide, die Besten der Männer—dort in eben jener göttlichen Versammlungshalle zurück.
वैशम्पायन उवाच
Educational Q&A
The verse highlights a moral pattern in epic narrative: when a righteous stabilizing presence (Kṛṣṇa) withdraws, those motivated by envy and manipulation (Duryodhana and Śakuni) remain to exploit the situation. It subtly warns that ethical order in governance depends not only on power and splendor but on the character guiding decisions.
After Kṛṣṇa leaves for Dvārakā, Duryodhana and Śakuni do not depart; they stay behind in the magnificent assembly hall. Their lingering signals continued fascination with the hall’s grandeur and, more importantly, sets the stage for further plotting connected with the court and the coming conflict.