Shloka 214
Strī-satkāra (On honoring women) — Mahābhārata 13.46
ब्रह्म! यौवनमदसे उन्मत्त रहनेवाली उस स्त्रीकी (उसके शरीरमें प्रवेश किये बिना) रक्षा करना तुम्हारे वशकी बात नहीं थी। अतः तुमने अपनी ओरसे कोई पाप नहीं किया; इसलिये मैं तुमपर प्रसन्न हूँ ।।
Brahman! yauvanamadase unmattarahanavālī tasya striyāḥ (tasya śarīre praviśya vinā) rakṣaṇaṃ tava vaśakī bāto na āsīt. ataḥ tvayā svataḥ kaścid api pāpaḥ na kṛtaḥ; tasmāt tvayi ahaṃ prasannaḥ. manodoṣavihīnānāṃ na doṣaḥ syāt tathā tava. anyathā liṅgyate kāntā snehenānyathā duhitā. niṣkaṣāyo viśuddhas tvaṃ rucyāveśān na dūṣitaḥ. yadi tv ahaṃ tvāṃ durvṛttam adrākṣaṃ dvijasattama, śapeyaṃ tvām ahaṃ krodhān na me ’trāsti vicāraṇā.
Vipula sprach: „O Brahmane, es lag nicht in deiner Macht, jene Frau, die vom Rausch der Jugend betört war, zu schützen, ohne in ihren Körper einzugehen. Darum hast du von deiner Seite keine Sünde begangen; deshalb bin ich dir gewogen. Wer im Geist frei von Makel ist, dem haftet keine Schuld an—so war es auch bei dir. Die geliebte Gattin umarmt man mit einer Art von Zuneigung; die Tochter mit einer anderen—mit elterlicher Zärtlichkeit. In dir ist keine Leidenschaft; du bist gänzlich rein; daher wurdest du, obwohl du in Rucis Körper eingingst, nicht befleckt. Doch hätte ich dich böse handeln sehen, o Bester unter den Brahmanen, so hätte ich dich im Zorn verflucht—ohne jedes Zögern.“
विपुल उवाच
Educational Q&A
Moral blame depends primarily on inner intention and mental purity: when the mind is free from lust or corrupt motive, an act done under compulsion of duty (here, protection) does not generate sin. The verse also distinguishes appropriate forms of affection—conjugal vs parental—to clarify ethical boundaries.
Vipula addresses a Brahmin who had to enter another person’s body (Ruci’s) in order to protect a woman overcome by youthful passion. Vipula declares him innocent because his mind was passionless and his purpose protective, while adding that he would have cursed him immediately had he observed genuine misconduct.