Shloka 29
The Examination of Pearls and Padmarāga (Ruby): Origins, Marks, Defects, and Valuation
गुणोपपन्नेन सहावबद्धोमेणिर्न धार्यो विगुणो हि जात्या / न कौस्तुभेनापि सहावबद्धं विद्वान्विजातिं बिभृयात्कदाचित्
guṇopapannena sahāvabaddhomeṇirna dhāryo viguṇo hi jātyā / na kaustubhenāpi sahāvabaddhaṃ vidvānvijātiṃ bibhṛyātkadācit
Ein Edelstein, der von Natur aus fehlerhaft ist, sollte nicht getragen werden – selbst wenn er zusammen mit einem Edelstein von hervorragender Qualität gefasst ist. Ebenso sollte ein Weiser, selbst wenn etwas mit dem Kaustubha-Juwel selbst verbunden ist, niemals das akzeptieren oder tragen, was von minderwertiger Art ist.
Lord Vishnu (in dialogue with Garuda/Vinata-putra)
Concept: Do not bear what is intrinsically defective or inferior by nature; association with excellence does not redeem inherent fault.
Vedantic Theme: Saṅga-doṣa and viveka: discern intrinsic qualities; avoid mistaking proximity to the sacred/excellent for true worth.
Application: In choosing gems, tools, partners, advisors, or habits: reject fundamentally harmful/low-quality elements even if packaged with prestige.
Primary Rasa: shanta
Secondary Rasa: karuna
Related Themes: Garuda Purana 1.70: doṣa-guṇa evaluation; warnings about wearing flawed gems
FAQs
This verse teaches viveka: even if something appears respectable due to its association with the excellent, its inherent defects remain; a wise person should refuse what is intrinsically unfit.
By stressing discernment and purity of conduct, it supports the Purana’s larger framework that one’s choices and associations shape character and karma, which in turn shape post-death consequences.
Do not justify harmful habits, unethical groups, or corrupt influences just because they are linked to respected people or institutions; evaluate by intrinsic quality and dharmic impact.