Shloka 8
दीक्षाया: पशुसंस्थाया: सौत्रामण्याश्च सत्तमा: । अन्यत्र दीक्षितस्यापि नान्नमश्नन् हि दुष्यति ॥ ८ ॥
dīkṣāyāḥ paśu-saṁsthāyāḥ sautrāmaṇyāś ca sattamāḥ anyatra dīkṣitasyāpi nānnam aśnan hi duṣyati
O reinste Brāhmaṇas, außer in der Zeitspanne zwischen der Weihe des Opfernden und der eigentlichen Tieropferung — und bei Opfern außer dem Sautrāmaṇi — ist selbst für den Geweihten das Essen von Speise nicht verunreinigend.
The cowherd boys anticipated the possible objection from the brāhmaṇas that they couldn’t give the boys any food because they themselves had not yet eaten, and that a priest initiated to perform a sacrifice should not eat. Therefore the boys humbly informed the brāhmaṇas about various technicalities of ritualistic sacrifice. The cowherd boys were not unaware of the formalities of Vedic culture, but their real intention was simply to render loving service to Lord Kṛṣṇa.
FAQs
In this verse, Krishna states that in certain Vedic rites—such as initiation and specific sacrifices—an initiated person is not considered impure for eating elsewhere; rather, refusing to eat can be harmful.
Krishna was countering their excuse of “ritual restriction” to deny Him food, pointing out that their own ritual categories allow eating, so their refusal was not truly based on dharma but on lack of devotion and understanding.
Do not use religious technicalities as a pretext to avoid serving God and devotees; apply rules with their intended purpose—supporting life, duty, and devotion—rather than as rigid excuses.