HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 17Shloka 12
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 12

Shraddhatraya Vibhaga YogaShraddhatraya Vibhaga Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 12 illustration

अभिसंधाय तु फलं दम्भार्थमपि चैव यत् । इज्यते भरतश्रेष्ठ तं यज्ञं विद्धि राजसम् ॥ १७.१२ ॥

abhisandhāya tu phalaṃ dambhārtham api caiva yat | ijyate bharataśreṣṭha taṃ yajñaṃ viddhi rājasam || 17.12 ||

Doch, o Bester der Bharatas: Das Opfer, das in der Absicht auf Frucht und auch aus Prahlerei dargebracht wird, erkenne als rajasisch (von Rajas bestimmt).

परन्तु हे भरतश्रेष्ठ! जो यज्ञ फल को चाहकर तथा दिखावे के लिए किया जाता है, उस यज्ञ को राजस जानो।

But the sacrifice that is performed with an eye to reward, and also for display, know that to be rajasic, O best of the Bharatas.

Interpretations converge: ‘dambha’ is commonly ‘ostentation/hypocrisy.’ Academic notes often stress mixed motivation—instrumental (phala) and social (display)—as characteristic of rajas.

अभिसन्धायhaving aimed at / intending
अभिसन्धाय:
Rootअभि-सम्-√धा
तुbut / indeed
तु:
Rootतु
फलम्fruit (result)
फलम्:
Karma
Rootफल
दम्भार्थम्for the sake of ostentation
दम्भार्थम्:
Rootदम्भ-अर्थ
अपिalso / even
अपि:
Rootअपि
and
:
Root
एवindeed / just
एव:
Rootएव
यत्that which
यत्:
Rootयद्
इज्यतेis performed (as a sacrifice)
इज्यते:
Root√यज्
भरतश्रेष्ठO best of the Bharatas
भरतश्रेष्ठ:
Rootभरत-श्रेष्ठ
तम्that (one)
तम्:
Karma
Rootतद्
यज्ञम्sacrifice
यज्ञम्:
Karma
Rootयज्ञ
विद्धिknow (you) / understand
विद्धि:
Root√विद्
राजसम्as rājasa (of the mode of passion)
राजसम्:
Rootराजस
Krishna
Rajas-guṇaYajñaPhala (reward)Dambha (ostentation)
Instrumental religiositySocial display and statusDesire as motivatorMixed ethical quality

FAQs

The verse points to how reward-seeking and image-management can make practices psychologically unstable, as they depend on external validation and uncertain outcomes.

Rajas binds through attachment to results and identity; sacrifice becomes a means of self-assertion rather than a clarifying discipline.

It contrasts with the sattvic sacrifice (17.11) by shifting from duty to outcome and reputation, continuing the guṇa-based taxonomy.

It can be applied to philanthropy, activism, or professional work done primarily for prestige or metrics rather than intrinsic responsibility.