HomeVamana PuranaAdh. 61Shloka 19
Next Verse

Vamana Purana — Sin-Destroying Hymn (Part 2), Shloka 19

The Second Sin-Destroying Hymn (Pāpaśamana Stava) and Syncretic Praise of Hari-Hara

श्रीकण्ठं वासुदेवं नीलकण्ठं सदण्डिनम् नमस्ये सर्वमनघं गौरीशं नकुलीस्वरम्

śrīkaṇṭhaṃ vāsudevaṃ nīlakaṇṭhaṃ sadaṇḍinam namasye sarvamanaghaṃ gaurīśaṃ nakulīsvaram

{"location": "Kaṭāha; Siṃhala-dvīpa; Śakrāhva", "location_type": "tirtha", "region": "Kaṭāha (often identified with Kedah/Kataha in Southeast Asian/Maritime Indic horizon in later geography); Siṃhala-dvīpa (Sri Lanka); Śakrāhva (a named locale, possibly a city/region associated with Indra/Śakra)", "sacred_significance": "Shows Purāṇic sacred geography extending beyond mainland to dvīpas; enumerates Vaiṣṇava forms (Upendra) and local epithets tied to iconography (lotus-beloved; garlanded with kunda flowers).", "cosmic_realm": "bhuloka"}

:
:
:
:
Unspecified eulogist/narrator within the chapter’s stuti-context (addressing the Supreme through Śaiva-Vaiṣṇava nomenclature)
ShivaVishnuParvati
Shaiva-Vaishnava unity (Vāsudeva alongside Śiva epithets)Pāśupata/ascetic Śaivism (Nakulīśvara; staff-bearing imagery)Purity and faultlessness of the divine (anagha)Mythic allusion (Nīlakaṇṭha: poison-bearing episode)

{ "primaryRasa": "adbhuta", "secondaryRasa": "shanta", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }

FAQs

The verse exemplifies Purāṇic inclusivism: the sacred narrative space (especially in a māhātmya) is sanctified by acknowledging both Vaiṣṇava and Śaiva manifestations, implying a shared supreme divinity accessible through multiple names.

Nakulīśvara (often aligned with Lākulīśa/Nakulīśa) denotes a revered Śaiva authority associated with the Pāśupata tradition. In stuti, it functions as a powerful Śiva-epithet highlighting ascetic lineage and doctrinal authority.

It can indicate Śiva’s ascetic/disciplinary aspect (a renunciant bearing a staff) and, more broadly, the Lord as the upholder of order (daṇḍa as chastisement/justice). The verse does not specify a particular icon, so both resonances are plausible.