राजा-दैवतत्वम् — The King as a Stabilizing ‘Daivata’ (Divine Function) in Social Order
नाराजकेषु राष्ट्रेषु वस्तव्यमिति रोचये । नाराजकेषु राष्ट्रेषु हव्यमग्निर्वहत्युत,मेरी रुचि तो यह है कि जहाँ कोई राजा न हो, उन देशोंमें निवास ही नहीं करना चाहिये। बिना राजाके राज्यमें दिये हुए हविष्यको अग्निदेव वहन नहीं करते
bhīṣma uvāca |
nārājakeṣu rāṣṭreṣu vastavyam iti rocaye |
nārājakeṣu rāṣṭreṣu havyam agnir vahaty uta ||
ভীষ্ম বললেন— আমার স্থির মত এই যে, যেখানে রাজা নেই সেখানে বাস করা উচিত নয়। রাজাহীন দেশে অর্পিত হব্যও অগ্নিদেব বহন করেন না।
भीष्म उवाच
Bhishma emphasizes that legitimate kingship is essential for dharma and social stability: without a ruler, order collapses so deeply that even Vedic ritual is portrayed as ineffective—Agni will not ‘carry’ the offering—signaling a breakdown of both civic and sacred life.
In Shanti Parva’s instruction on governance and rajadharma, Bhishma advises the listener that living in a kingless realm is undesirable. He underscores the point with a ritual image: in the absence of a king, even sacrificial offerings fail to reach their intended divine recipients.