Ritadhvaja’s Aid to Galava and Andhaka’s Infatuation with Gauri
अथोवाचासुरो मूढो वचनं मन्मथान्धकः कस्येयं चारुसर्वाङ्गी वने चरति सुन्दरी
athovācāsuro mūḍho vacanaṃ manmathāndhakaḥ kasyeyaṃ cārusarvāṅgī vane carati sundarī
তাৰ পিছত মন্মথে অন্ধ হোৱা মোহগ্ৰস্ত অসুৰ অন্ধকে ক’লে— ‘বনত ঘূৰি ফুৰা এই সৰ্বাঙ্গসুন্দৰী নাৰীজনী কাৰ?’
{ "primaryRasa": "shringara", "secondaryRasa": "hasya", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
It marks Andhaka as ‘blinded by Manmatha’—a rhetorical diagnosis that his perception and judgment are overridden by erotic compulsion. The Purāṇic style often encodes psychological states as divine agencies (here, Kāma).
The phrasing ‘kasya iyam’ reflects a possessive social imagination—viewing the woman as belonging to someone (husband/father/household). In the Andhaka narrative, this possessive impulse is part of his adharma and foreshadows his attempt to appropriate what is not his.
Not in this verse. Without a proper-name (e.g., a named vana, tirtha, or mountain), it remains a generic forest setting used to stage the encounter.