Śaṅkha–Likhita Upākhyāna: Daṇḍa, Confession, and the Purification of Kingship (शङ्ख-लिखितोपाख्यानम्)
दैवेनाभ्याहतो राजा कर्मकाले महद्ुते । न साधयति यत् कर्म न तत्राहुरतिक्रमम्
daivenābhyāhato rājā karmakāle mahadute | na sādhayati yat karma na tatrāhur atikramam ||
বৈশম্পায়নে ক’লে—“কৰ্মকালত দেৱবাধাত আঘাতপ্ৰাপ্ত হৈ যদি ৰজা কোনো কাৰ্য সিদ্ধ কৰিব নোৱাৰে, জ্ঞানীসকলে তাক ধৰ্মাতি-ক্রম বুলি নকয়। সেই ব্যৰ্থতা ইচ্ছাকৃত কৰ্তব্যভংগ নহয়; প্ৰবল ভাগ্যৰ ফল বুলি ধৰা হয়।”
वैशम्पायन उवाच
If a ruler fails to complete an intended duty because overpowering fate intervenes at the crucial moment, that failure is not judged as a willful breach of dharma; culpability depends on intention and agency, not merely on outcome.
Vaiśampāyana states a general principle used in ethical reasoning: when circumstances attributed to daiva obstruct a king during the time of action, the tradition does not label the resulting non-fulfillment as an atikrama (transgression).