Daṇḍa as the Foundation of Social Order (दण्डप्रतिष्ठा)
आततायी हि यो हन्यादाततायिनमागतम् । न तेन भ्रूणहा स स्यान्मन्युस्तं मन्युमारछति
arjuna uvāca | ātatāyī hi yo hanyād ātatāyinam āgatam | na tena bhrūṇahā sa syān manyus taṃ manyum ṛcchati ||
যি অস্ত্ৰ হাতে লৈ হত্যা কৰিবলৈ আহে—সেই আততায়ীক যদি কোনোবাই প্ৰতিহত কৰিবলৈ গৈ বধ কৰে, তেন্তে সি ভ্ৰূণহত্যাৰ পাপৰ অংশী নহয়; কিয়নো হিংসাত উদ্যত আক্ৰমণকাৰীৰ ক্ৰোধেই ৰক্ষকৰ মনতো সেই মুহূর্ততে ক্ৰোধ জগায়।
अजुन उवाच
Killing an armed aggressor who comes to murder is treated as a dharmic act of defense, not as a grievous sin like bhrūṇa-hatyā; moral culpability is mitigated because the attacker’s violent intent and wrath drive the confrontation.
Arjuna argues a point of dharma: when a person is confronted by an ātatāyin (a deadly assailant), slaying that aggressor in response does not make the defender a ‘bhrūṇahā’; he frames it as a compelled defensive act arising from the attacker’s aggression.