HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 17Shloka 13
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Bhagavad Gita — Shraddhatraya Vibhaga Yoga, Shloka 13

Shraddhatraya Vibhaga Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 13 illustration

विधिहीनमसृष्टान्नं मन्त्रहीनमदक्षिणम् । श्रद्धाविरहितं यज्ञं तामसं परिचक्षते ॥ १७.१३ ॥

vidhi-hīnam asṛṣṭānnaṃ mantra-hīnam adakṣiṇam | śraddhā-virahitaṃ yajñaṃ tāmasaṃ paricakṣate || 17.13 ||

যি যজ্ঞ শাস্ত্ৰবিধি-বিহীন, অন্ন-অৰ্পণ/অন্নদান-বিহীন, মন্ত্ৰ-বিহীন, দক্ষিণা-বিহীন আৰু শ্ৰদ্ধা-বিহীন, তাক তামস যজ্ঞ বুলি কোৱা হয়।

जो यज्ञ शास्त्रविधि से रहित, अन्नदान से रहित, मन्त्र से रहित, दक्षिणा से रहित और श्रद्धा से रहित होता है, उसे तामस कहते हैं।

A sacrifice lacking prescribed procedure, lacking proper distribution of food, lacking mantra, lacking honorarium/gift, and lacking faith—this is called tamasic.

‘Asṛṣṭānna’ is variously glossed as ‘without food-offering’ or ‘without distribution of food (to participants/recipients).’ ‘Dakṣiṇā’ may be a priestly fee in ritual context, or more broadly a due gift; academic translations often keep it neutral as ‘gift/fee.’

विधिहीनम्devoid of prescribed rule/ritual injunction
विधिहीनम्:
Rootविधि + हीन
असृष्टान्नम्with food not properly distributed/offered
असृष्टान्नम्:
Rootअसृष्ट + अन्न
मन्त्रहीनम्without (proper) mantras
मन्त्रहीनम्:
Rootमन्त्र + हीन
अदक्षिणम्without priestly fee/gift (dakṣiṇā)
अदक्षिणम्:
Rootअ + दक्षिणा
श्रद्धाविरहितम्devoid of faith
श्रद्धाविरहितम्:
Rootश्रद्धा + विरहित
यज्ञम्sacrifice; ritual offering
यज्ञम्:
Karma
Rootयज्ञ
तामसम्tamasic; of the quality of tamas
तामसम्:
Rootतामस
परिचक्षतेthey call; they describe
परिचक्षते:
Root√चक्ष् (आख्याने) + परि
Krishna
Tamas-guṇaŚraddhā (faith/commitment)YajñaRitual normativity (vidhi)
Neglect of form and meaningErosion of intentionalityFaith as orientationRitual as social-ethical practice

FAQs

The verse treats ‘faith’ as committed attention and seriousness; when absent, actions become mechanical or careless, reflecting tamasic disengagement.

Tamas obscures understanding and order; the listed deficiencies portray a practice detached from both normative structure and inner orientation.

It completes the threefold classification of sacrifice (sattvic/rajasic/tamasic) following the earlier dietary triad.

It can be read as a critique of performative or poorly grounded practices—religious or secular—done without care, competence, or sincere commitment.