मायामोह-प्रवर्तन, वेदमार्ग-बहिष्कार, तथा पाषण्ड-संसर्ग-दोषः
Māyāmoha’s Delusion, Rejection of the Vedic Path, and the Fault of Heretical Association
सापि द्वितीये संप्राप्ते वर्षे दिव्येन चक्षुषा ज्ञात्वा सृगालं तं द्रष्टुं ययौ कोलाहलं गिरिम्
sāpi dvitīye saṃprāpte varṣe divyena cakṣuṣā jñātvā sṛgālaṃ taṃ draṣṭuṃ yayau kolāhalaṃ girim
فلما حلّت السنة الثانية، علمت هي أيضًا بعينٍ إلهية، فانطلقت لترى ذلك ابنَ آوى، ومضت إلى جبل كولاهالا.
Sage Parāśara (narrating to Maitreya)
It indicates knowledge that surpasses ordinary perception, showing how Purāṇic narratives frame key turns of fate as being revealed through higher, divinely granted awareness.
By marking the arrival of the second year and linking action to revealed knowledge, the narration emphasizes orderly progression—time, insight, and consequent action moving in a dharmic sequence.
Even without Vishnu being named in the verse, the Purāṇic worldview assumes a cosmos governed by Vishnu’s supreme sovereignty, where time, knowledge, and destiny operate within the sustaining order he embodies.