Drupada’s Alarm and Inquiry Regarding Śikhaṇḍinī (द्रुपदस्य भय-विमर्शः)
एतत् तत्त्वमहं वेद जन्म तात शिखण्डिन: । ततो नैनं हनिष्यामि समरेष्वाततायिनम्
etat tattvam ahaṁ veda janma tāta śikhaṇḍinaḥ | tato nainaṁ haniṣyāmi samareṣv ātatāyinam ||
قال بهيشما: «يا بُنيّ، إنّي أعلم الحقيقةَ الكاملةَ لولادةِ شيخاندين. لذلك لن أقتله في ساحة القتال—even إن دخل الميدان معتديًا. ما دمتُ أعرف أصلَه فلا أستطيع أن أُقدم على ضربه.»
भीष्म उवाच
Even in war, ethical restraint can override the impulse to kill: Bhishma grounds his decision in knowledge of Shikhandin’s true birth and identity, implying that dharma is not merely rule-following but conscientious discernment about whom it is right to strike.
In the Udyoga Parva’s war-preparations context, Bhishma explains to his interlocutor that he knows Shikhandin’s real origin and therefore will not kill him in battle, even if Shikhandin approaches as an ātatāyin (aggressor).