नच तौ वक्ष्यतो5धर्ममिति मे नैछ्ठिकी मतिः । नापि युक्त च कौन्तेय निवर्तितुमयुध्यत:,“मेरा तो यह निश्चित मत है कि वे दोनों अधर्मकी बात नहीं कहेंगे। कुन्तीनन्दन! अब हमारे लिये युद्धसे निवृत्त हो जाना भी उचित नहीं है”
na ca tau vakṣyato ’dharmam iti me naiṣṭhikī matiḥ | nāpi yuktaṃ ca kaunteya nivartitum ayudhyataḥ ||
«إنني على يقين راسخ أن هذين الاثنين لن يقولا ما يخالف الدارما. وأنت يا ابنَ كونتي، ليس من اللائق بنا أن ننسحب من الحرب ونحن لم ندخل القتال بعد.»
वैशग्पायन उवाच
The verse asserts two ethical points: confidence that trustworthy figures will not advocate adharma, and the impropriety of retreating from a justly undertaken conflict out of hesitation—especially before even entering the fight—highlighting steadiness in dharma and duty.
In the Udyoga Parva’s pre-war deliberations, Vaiśaṃpāyana reports a speaker’s firm judgment: the two persons under discussion will not counsel unrighteousness, and therefore the Pāṇḍavas (addressed as Kaunteya) should not withdraw from the impending war merely from reluctance.