Nahūṣa’s Pride, the Ṛṣi-Borne Palanquin, and the Search for Indra (नहुष-इन्द्राणी-प्रकरणम्)
अधर्मज्ञो महर्षीणां वाहनाच्च ततः शुभे । इष्टिं चाहं करिष्यामि विनाशायास्य दुर्मते:
adharmajño maharṣīṇāṁ vāhanācca tataḥ śubhe | iṣṭiṁ cāhaṁ kariṣyāmi vināśāyāsya durmateḥ ||
قال شاليا: «يا صاحبة اليُمن، إذ إنه جاهل بالدارما وقد اغتصب حتى مركبةَ المها-ريشيين، فسأقيم أنا أيضاً شعيرةً قربانيةً تُقصد بها هلاكُ ذلك السيّئ النية».
शल्य उवाच
The verse frames ethical failure (ignorance of dharma and disrespect toward sages) as a grave offense that invites deliberate counteraction; it also shows how ritual action (iṣṭi) can be conceived as morally charged—used not only for welfare but as a response to wrongdoing.
Śalya addresses an auspicious lady and condemns a certain person as adharma-minded, citing the taking of the great seers’ conveyance as evidence; he then declares his intention to perform an iṣṭi specifically aimed at bringing about that person’s destruction.