Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 8

ऋत्विग्धर्मः, दक्षिणा-न्यायः, तपसः परमार्थः

Ritvij-Dharma, the Norm of Dakṣiṇā, and the Higher Meaning of Tapas

नेदं प्रतिधनं शास्त्रमापद्धर्मानुशास्त्रत: । आज्ञा शास्त्रस्य घोरेयं न शक्ति समवेक्षते,अतः दक्षिणामें दिये जानेवाले धनके विषयमें जो यह शास्त्र-वचन है, यह आपत्कालिक धर्मशास्त्रके अनुसार नहीं है। मेरी समझमें तो यह शास्त्रकी आज्ञा भयंकर है; क्योंकि यह इस बातकी ओर नहीं देखती कि दातामें कितने दानकी शक्ति है

yudhiṣṭhira uvāca |

nedaṃ pratidhanaṃ śāstram āpaddharmānuśāsataḥ |

ājñā śāstrasya ghoreyaṃ na śaktiṃ samavekṣate ||

قال يودهيشتِهيرا: «إن هذه القاعدة في الشاسترا بشأن “المكافأة بالمال” لا توافق تعاليم الدارما في أزمنة الشدّة (آبادّهرما). وفي رأيي، هذا الأمر من الشاسترا قاسٍ، لأنه لا يراعي قدرة المتصدّق الحقيقية—كم يستطيع أن يعطي حقًّا.»

{'nedaṃ (na idaṃ)''not this
{'nedaṃ (na idaṃ)':
this is not', 'pratidhana''repayment/return by wealth
this is not', 'pratidhana':
compensatory payment (esp. in the context of gifts/fees)', 'śāstram''scriptural injunction
compensatory payment (esp. in the context of gifts/fees)', 'śāstram':
authoritative teaching', 'āpaddharma''dharma for times of calamity/distress (emergency ethics)', 'anuśāsataḥ': 'according to the instruction/teaching
authoritative teaching', 'āpaddharma':
as enjoined', 'ājñā''command
as enjoined', 'ājñā':
injunction', 'ghorā''terrible
injunction', 'ghorā':
severe', 'na ... samavekṣate''does not consider
severe', 'na ... samavekṣate':
does not take into account', 'śakti''ability
does not take into account', 'śakti':

युधिछिर उवाच

Y
Yudhiṣṭhira
Ś
Śāstra (scriptural authority)
Ā
Āpaddharma (emergency dharma)

Educational Q&A

Yudhiṣṭhira argues that ethical injunctions about giving or repayment must be interpreted with context: in distress (āpaddharma), a rule that ignores a person’s actual capacity (śakti) becomes morally harsh and potentially unjust.

In the Śānti Parva’s discussions on dharma, Yudhiṣṭhira questions a scriptural-sounding rule concerning wealth given as a due/fee or repayment, objecting that it does not align with emergency-dharma principles because it fails to consider the giver’s means.