Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 59

गदायुद्धप्रतिज्ञा — The Vow and Terms of the Mace Duel

अनीश्वरश्व पृथिवीं कथं त्वं दातुमिच्छसि । त्वयेयं पृथिवी राजन्‌ किन्न दत्ता तदैव हि

anīśvaraś ca pṛthivīṁ kathaṁ tvaṁ dātum icchasi | tvayeyaṁ pṛthivī rājan kiṁ na dattā tadaiva hi ||

قال يودهيشثيرا: «إن لم تكن أنت صاحب السيادة على الأرض، فكيف تريد أن تهبها؟ أيها الملك، إن كانت هذه الأرض لك حقاً، فلماذا لم تُعطَ في ذلك الحين بعينه؟»

अनीश्वरःnot being the lord (not having authority)
अनीश्वरः:
Karta
TypeAdjective
Rootअनीश्वर
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
and
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
पृथिवीम्the earth/kingdom
पृथिवीम्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootपृथिवी
FormFeminine, Accusative, Singular
कथम्how
कथम्:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootकथम्
त्वम्you
त्वम्:
Karta
TypePronoun
Rootयुष्मद्
FormNominative, Singular
दातुम्to give
दातुम्:
TypeVerb
Rootदा
Formतुमुन्, Parasmaipada (usage-neutral in infinitive)
इच्छसिyou desire/wish
इच्छसि:
TypeVerb
Rootइष् (इच्छ्)
FormPresent (Lat), Second, Singular, Parasmaipada
त्वयाby you
त्वया:
Karana
TypePronoun
Rootयुष्मद्
FormInstrumental, Singular
इयम्this
इयम्:
Karta
TypePronoun
Rootइदम्
FormFeminine, Nominative, Singular
पृथिवीthe earth/kingdom
पृथिवी:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootपृथिवी
FormFeminine, Nominative, Singular
राजन्O king
राजन्:
TypeNoun
Rootराजन्
FormMasculine, Vocative, Singular
किम्what?/why?
किम्:
TypePronoun
Rootकिम्
FormNeuter, Nominative, Singular
not
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
दत्ताgiven
दत्ता:
TypeVerb
Rootदा
Formक्त (past passive participle), Feminine, Nominative, Singular
तदाthen/at that time
तदा:
Adhikarana
TypeIndeclinable
Rootतदा
एवindeed/just
एव:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootएव
हिfor/indeed
हि:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootहि

युधिछिर उवाच

Y
Yudhiṣṭhira
P
pṛthivī (the earth/kingdom)

Educational Q&A

A gift is ethically valid only when the giver has rightful authority over the object. Yudhiṣṭhira challenges the morality of “donating” the earth/kingdom without true sovereignty, stressing that legitimacy and ownership are prerequisites for righteous giving.

In the aftermath of the great war, Yudhiṣṭhira interrogates a claim about granting the earth/kingdom. He points out a contradiction: if the speaker was not truly the lord of the land, the intention to give it is improper; and if it really belonged to him, it should have been granted earlier—exposing inconsistency and questioning the ethical basis of the claim.